Narrative:

Training at sector 57. I was the ojti (on job training instructor). Parachute/ jump aircraft C182; over flight aircraft RV10. The RV10 was turned 15 degrees right of course to miss the jump aircraft. It seems that the RV10 never turned as a result of being annoyed for other reasons. The result of not turning was an unsafe event which caused the two aircraft to come within a mile of each other and at or near the same altitude. The pilot then further deviated and turned left to miss the traffic. I recommend the pilot of the RV10 comply with all ATC clearances.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: An IFR RV10 pilot and the two ZAU ARTCC Controllers involved described a disagreement over an altitude assignment and a vector to avoid a jump plane resulting in a conflict.

Narrative: Training at Sector 57. I was the OJTI (On Job Training Instructor). Parachute/ Jump aircraft C182; over flight aircraft RV10. The RV10 was turned 15 degrees right of course to miss the jump aircraft. It seems that the RV10 never turned as a result of being annoyed for other reasons. The result of not turning was an unsafe event which caused the two aircraft to come within a mile of each other and at or near the same altitude. The pilot then further deviated and turned left to miss the traffic. I recommend the pilot of the RV10 comply with all ATC clearances.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.