D10 controller reported of an unsafe situation where another controller did not use the pre-arranged...

Narrative:

I was working feeder east 1/2 and dallas east combined. Aircraft X climbed; clear of traffic; into my airspace; presumably using prearranged airspace; without displaying the aircraft to me. This is probably the sixth or seventh report of this nature that I have filed and will continue to file them until told otherwise. The reason I am filing these is to protect myself from management's accusation that I might have knowingly allowed aircraft to penetrate my airspace without taking action. In a briefing shortly after the issuance of the cease and desist our management; stated that 'if they are taking down one; it's just as easy to take down two'; in regards to aircraft in your airspace without a point out. I took this to mean that I am just as liable; as the airspace owner; as the person violating the airspace. I would like to point out that the constant scouring the video map for airspace violators takes focus away from the actual operation; which; in my opinion; makes the entire operation less safe.1) stop the cease and desist.2) a workgroup needs to be formed to overhaul the airspace; including prearranged airspace; to make sure that we are not because of faulty procedures violating airspace unwillfully.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: D10 Controller reported of an unsafe situation where another Controller did not use the Pre-Arranged Coordination Procedures (PACP) correctly leading to an airspace violation.

Narrative: I was working Feeder East 1/2 and Dallas East combined. Aircraft X climbed; clear of traffic; into my airspace; presumably using prearranged airspace; without displaying the aircraft to me. This is probably the sixth or seventh report of this nature that I have filed and will continue to file them until told otherwise. The reason I am filing these is to protect myself from management's accusation that I might have knowingly allowed aircraft to penetrate my airspace without taking action. In a briefing shortly after the issuance of the Cease and Desist our management; stated that 'if they are taking down one; it's just as easy to take down two'; in regards to aircraft in your airspace without a point out. I took this to mean that I am just as liable; as the airspace owner; as the person violating the airspace. I would like to point out that the constant scouring the video map for airspace violators takes focus away from the actual operation; which; in my opinion; makes the entire operation less safe.1) Stop the Cease and Desist.2) A workgroup needs to be formed to overhaul the airspace; including prearranged airspace; to make sure that we are not because of faulty procedures violating airspace unwillfully.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.

Attributes
ACN	1369186
Time
Date	201607
Local Time Of Day	1201-1800
Place
Locale Reference	D10.TRACON
State Reference	TX
Environment
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Make Model Name	Large Transport Low Wing 2 Turbojet Eng
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 121
Flight Phase	Climb
Flight Plan	IFR
Person 1
Function	Approach
Qualification	Air Traffic Control Fully Certified
Experience	Air Traffic Control Time Certified In Pos 1 (yrs) 4.5
Events
Anomaly	ATC Issue All Types Airspace Violation All Types Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy

D10 controller reported of an unsafe situation where another controller did not use the pre-arranged coordination procedures (pacp) correctly leading to an airspace violation.