 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
B737-ng captain reported different navigational data on the jeppesen paper charts when compared to electronic charts and the aircraft FMS database.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1305086 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201510 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | MHTG.ARTCC |
| State Reference | FO |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Night |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | B737 Next Generation Undifferentiated |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Cruise |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Component | |
| Aircraft Component | Aero Charts |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Captain |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 236 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
The paper jeppesen chart latin american hi/low 2 differs from the electronic jeppesen FD-pro charts; aircraft (FMS database) and release [document]. On L208 into mid the FD-pro and the aircraft have rudmi which is missing from the paper charts. On UB573 into bze the paper chart shows point penzo. The FD-pro and the aircraft have tuget instead. The lat/long coordinates are the same.additionally; the parza 3 restrictions loaded into the aircraft differ from those in FD-pro. FD-pro shows parza 9000 ft while the aircraft loaded 200B/10;000 ft. The ILS 07 note says 200B for the procedure and has 10;000 ft depicted for the holding pattern at parza. However; when I loaded the RNAV 07 which doesn't have those restrictions or even use parza; the box held onto 200B/10;000 ft at parza. As this was most restrictive we complied with it.I would not have noticed the enroute error as I use the FD-pro application; but I find many other pilots focus on the paper charts. They need to be updated or removed.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B737-NG Captain reported different navigational data on the Jeppesen paper charts when compared to electronic charts and the aircraft FMS database.
Narrative: The paper Jeppesen Chart Latin American HI/LOW 2 differs from the electronic Jeppesen FD-Pro charts; aircraft (FMS database) and release [document]. On L208 into MID the FD-Pro and the aircraft have RUDMI which is missing from the paper charts. On UB573 into BZE the paper chart shows point PENZO. The FD-Pro and the aircraft have TUGET instead. The Lat/Long coordinates are the same.Additionally; the PARZA 3 restrictions loaded into the aircraft differ from those in FD-Pro. FD-Pro shows PARZA 9000 ft while the aircraft loaded 200B/10;000 ft. The ILS 07 note says 200B for the procedure and has 10;000 ft depicted for the holding pattern at PARZA. However; when I loaded the RNAV 07 which doesn't have those restrictions or even use PARZA; the box held onto 200B/10;000 ft at PARZA. As this was most restrictive we complied with it.I would not have noticed the enroute error as I use the FD-Pro application; but I find many other pilots focus on the paper charts. They need to be updated or removed.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.