![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1271108 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201506 |
| Local Time Of Day | 0001-0600 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | P50.TRACON |
| State Reference | AZ |
| Environment | |
| Light | Night |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Large Transport |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
| Route In Use | Vectors |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Make Model Name | Medium Transport Low Wing 2 Turbojet Eng |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
| Route In Use | Visual Approach |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Approach |
| Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
| Experience | Air Traffic Control Time Certified In Pos 1 (yrs) 6.2 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict Airborne Conflict Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Track / Heading All Types |
Narrative:
Training in progress on freeway sector. We had discussed the new change coming in the 7110.65 chapter 5 regarding opposing base legs and ways to mitigate the issue earlier in the session. My trainee had aircraft Y on a base leg of 170 degrees and 4;000 feet and had just cleared for the va via a 230 heading (all in compliance with directives) to runway 26. The opposing final had aircraft X northbound at 4;000 feet; airport in sight and planned to turn to final but got distracted by coordination with the arc about a light aircraft inbound from the southeast. Visual separation was applied by both my trainee (the aircraft Y) and the opposite final. Aircraft X was cleared for the va runway 25L; but overshot their final. Ensure offset base leg headings (I instructed my cpc-it to listen for the other finals base headings); i.e. 180/010. Make it a point of emphasis to have the finals talk to each other more until these new .65 procedures settle in. It will be a slight learning curve; but my cpc-it seems to grasp the concept and we will consider this a high priority for the next sessions.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: P50 Controller describes a new procedure for the arrival sectors. One aircraft overshot their turn to final causing a conflict.
Narrative: Training in progress on Freeway sector. We had discussed the new change coming in the 7110.65 Chapter 5 regarding opposing base legs and ways to mitigate the issue earlier in the session. My trainee had Aircraft Y on a base leg of 170 degrees and 4;000 feet and had just cleared for the VA via a 230 heading (all in compliance with directives) to Runway 26. The opposing final had Aircraft X northbound at 4;000 feet; airport in sight and planned to turn to final but got distracted by coordination with the ARC about a light aircraft inbound from the southeast. Visual separation was applied by both my trainee (the Aircraft Y) and the opposite final. Aircraft X was cleared for the VA Runway 25L; but overshot their final. Ensure offset base leg headings (I instructed my CPC-IT to listen for the other finals base headings); i.e. 180/010. Make it a point of emphasis to have the finals talk to each other more until these new .65 procedures settle in. It will be a slight learning curve; but my CPC-IT seems to grasp the concept and we will consider this a high priority for the next sessions.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.