|  | 37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System | 
| 
 | 
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1270370 | 
| Time | |
| Date | 201506 | 
| Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 | 
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport | 
| State Reference | US | 
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC | 
| Light | Daylight | 
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Bonanza 33 | 
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 | 
| Flight Phase | Landing | 
| Route In Use | Visual Approach | 
| Flight Plan | VFR | 
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Pilot Flying Single Pilot | 
| Qualification | Flight Crew Commercial Flight Crew Instrument | 
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 1.8 Flight Crew Total 395 Flight Crew Type 395 | 
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy | 
Narrative:
The flight involved a short trip to a new airport for a short weekend visit.... The flight concluded with a hard landing; which resulted in inappropriate braking and a blown left main tire. As the approach unfolded; the correct answer was to go around and set up with less energy. I was aware of that alternative and decided at the time that it was less desireable than proceeding with the landing; as I felt the airspeed was close enough that I could handle the landing. However; the plane continued to float and I had reservations about aborting in a full flap condition at low airspeed; so I continued the landing and tried to get the plane on the ground prematurely; which is a recipe for bouncing in a tricycle geared airplane.the runway does have a 1.3% slope in the the direction of the landing. Glide slope indicators had been NOTAM'd out of service (OTS). The 4;000 foot x 75 feet runway should not have been uncomfortably short or narrow for me landing a bonanza F33; with proper energy management. No one was injured and there is no other apparent damage to the airplane other than the tire. It is difficult to single out a single causal factor for this poor landing; but the prominent one probably was lack of recent flying experience.... I was legally current; but not as proficient as I could have been or should have been for flying a high-performance; complex airplane into an unfamiliar airport like the incident airport.I; like others who have been legally current but not sufficiently proficient because of inactivity; usually do not have a problem; unless there are other contributing; or I would prefer to say complicating; factors. There were several here; and that's perhaps the biggest lesson: yes; you can fly with relatively low recent experience--if there are no other contributing; or complicating; factors.... Looking back; I should have canceled this flight before it began. One check ride was not enough to give me a good margin of safety for a trip such as this; especially considering my mentally tired condition....
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: General Aviation Pilot experienced a hard landing and blown tire after floating results from excessive speed on approach to a down-sloping runway.
Narrative: The flight involved a short trip to a new airport for a short weekend visit.... The flight concluded with a hard landing; which resulted in inappropriate braking and a blown left main tire. As the approach unfolded; the correct answer was to go around and set up with less energy. I was aware of that alternative and decided at the time that it was less desireable than proceeding with the landing; as I felt the airspeed was close enough that I could handle the landing. However; the plane continued to float and I had reservations about aborting in a full flap condition at low airspeed; so I continued the landing and tried to get the plane on the ground prematurely; which is a recipe for bouncing in a tricycle geared airplane.The runway does have a 1.3% slope in the the direction of the landing. Glide slope indicators had been NOTAM'd Out of Service (OTS). The 4;000 foot x 75 feet runway should not have been uncomfortably short or narrow for me landing a Bonanza F33; with proper energy management. No one was injured and there is no other apparent damage to the airplane other than the tire. It is difficult to single out a single causal factor for this poor landing; but the prominent one probably was lack of recent flying experience.... I was legally current; but not as proficient as I could have been or should have been for flying a high-performance; complex airplane into an unfamiliar airport like the incident airport.I; like others who have been legally current but not sufficiently proficient because of inactivity; usually do not have a problem; unless there are other contributing; or I would prefer to say complicating; factors. There were several here; and that's perhaps the biggest lesson: yes; you can fly with relatively low recent experience--if there are no other contributing; or complicating; factors.... Looking back; I should have canceled this flight before it began. One check ride was not enough to give me a good margin of safety for a trip such as this; especially considering my mentally tired condition....
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.