![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1266826 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201505 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | FTW.Airport |
| State Reference | TX |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Falcon 10/100 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
| Route In Use | Visual Approach |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 30 Flight Crew Total 14000 Flight Crew Type 2000 |
| Person 2 | |
| Function | First Officer Pilot Not Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 30 Flight Crew Total 13000 Flight Crew Type 2000 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Inflight Event / Encounter CFTT / CFIT |
Narrative:
We were on an IFR flight plan; on a visual approach to runway 34; on a wide left base to final. I was using the ILS as a backup to the visual approach. I inappropriately armed the approach mode instead of the localizer mode; and when the glide slope needle started descending; I followed the flight director commands to descend.my copilot protested that something was wrong; and that I should not be descending any lower considering we were now at 800 feet AGL while still 5 miles from the runway. Immediately thereafter the control tower called and asked about our altitude.I immediately climbed back up to 1;500 feet AGL.we did not receive a traffic alert warning system (taws) alert.after landing we discussed that the flight director must have captured a false glide slope; and that I should not have armed the approach mode before being established on the localizer.I believe that a contributing factor was complacency due to the visual conditions.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FA10 flight crew reported descending to 800 feet AGL on a visual approach to FTW when the pilot flying followed a false glideslope.
Narrative: We were on an IFR flight plan; on a visual approach to runway 34; on a wide left base to final. I was using the ILS as a backup to the visual approach. I inappropriately armed the approach mode instead of the localizer mode; and when the glide slope needle started descending; I followed the flight director commands to descend.My copilot protested that something was wrong; and that I should not be descending any lower considering we were now at 800 feet AGL while still 5 miles from the runway. Immediately thereafter the control tower called and asked about our altitude.I immediately climbed back up to 1;500 feet AGL.We did not receive a Traffic Alert Warning System (TAWS) alert.After landing we discussed that the flight director must have captured a false glide slope; and that I should not have armed the approach mode before being established on the localizer.I believe that a contributing factor was complacency due to the visual conditions.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.