![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1240662 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201502 |
| Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ATL.Airport |
| State Reference | GA |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Dawn |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Medium Transport Low Wing 2 Turbojet Eng |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Taxi |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Captain |
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 127 |
| Person 2 | |
| Function | First Officer |
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 46 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural FAR Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
After aircraft was secured for push; we were de-iced due to overnight frost. The iceman communicated to us de-icing was complete and the aircraft was free of frozen contaminants. After engine start; the flight attendant called us and informed us that an overwing passenger (who is also a company pilot) wanted us to know that there was still visible frost on the wings. We called the ice crew back and queried them and asked to be de-iced again and to make sure it was done thoroughly and correctly. During communication with the iceman; it seemed clear they were not using proper phraseology and may have been unsure as to what their exact duties were. They proceeded to de-ice the aircraft a second time and then declared they were finished. I had to query as to whether or not the aircraft was now free of frozen contamination. They declared that yes it was; and we continued uneventfullyi feel that this atlanta ground de-ice crew was not following proper procedures. It is obviously imperative they do a thorough job. If not for the intervention of the company pilot; we would have been inadequately de-iced.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: An air crew were de-iced at the gate. After pushback; a Company Pilot riding as a passenger; reported that visible frost remained on the wings. They returned to the gate; were de-iced again and departed uneventfully.
Narrative: After aircraft was secured for push; we were de-iced due to overnight frost. The iceman communicated to us de-icing was complete and the aircraft was free of frozen contaminants. After engine start; the Flight Attendant called us and informed us that an overwing Passenger (who is also a Company Pilot) wanted us to know that there was still visible frost on the wings. We called the Ice Crew back and queried them and asked to be de-iced again and to make sure it was done thoroughly and correctly. During communication with the iceman; it seemed clear they were not using proper phraseology and may have been unsure as to what their exact duties were. They proceeded to de-ice the aircraft a second time and then declared they were finished. I had to query as to whether or not the aircraft was now free of frozen contamination. They declared that yes it was; and we continued uneventfullyI feel that this Atlanta Ground de-ice crew was not following proper procedures. It is obviously imperative they do a thorough job. If not for the intervention of the Company Pilot; we would have been inadequately de-iced.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.