![]()  | 
            37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System  | 
            
                
  | 
        
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1223772 | 
| Time | |
| Date | 201411 | 
| Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 | 
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | MDW.Airport | 
| State Reference | IL | 
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | Mixed | 
| Light | Night | 
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing | 
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 | 
| Flight Phase | Taxi | 
| Flight Plan | IFR | 
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Captain | 
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) | 
| Person 2 | |
| Function | First Officer | 
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) | 
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 200 Flight Crew Type 200  | 
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy | 
Narrative:
Flight operations reported that we taxied before deice was completed. Deice process underway; first officer (first officer) was communicating with de-ice crew and responded to 'deicing complete' radio call. We both saw a deice truck drive away on the service lane. Multiple deicing events were taking place on same frequency. Performed cross bleed start; called for taxi; cleared left and right; and to follow company traffic off left.tower informed us to call company and return to gate. Company said they needed to re-deice us as it was not complete and that we taxied while deice truck was still spraying. We responded that we acknowledged deicing complete as well as saw a truck drive away. In discussing the incident; the first officer and I thought they may have confused tail numbers as the frequency and ramp were very congested. Completed deicing and departed uneventfully. All checklists and fom/aom procedures were followed. It is now obvious that we took a similar call sign deicing complete call and assumed that our crew was clear based on the truck we saw on the service road. Also; the first officer cleared the right side for taxi just before the truck came around the corner of the wing. Suggestions for avoiding future miscommunication errors include requiring a visual wave off from iceman as is required from pushback crew and a dedicated frequency per truck so as to avoid other call signs.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: The flight crew departing MDW inadvertently accepted a 'de-icing complete' transmission intended for another aircraft and had to be recalled prior to takeoff to complete the de-icing process.
Narrative: Flight Operations reported that we taxied before deice was completed. Deice process underway; First Officer (FO) was communicating with de-ice crew and responded to 'deicing complete' radio call. We both saw a deice truck drive away on the service lane. Multiple deicing events were taking place on same frequency. Performed cross bleed start; called for taxi; cleared left and right; and to follow Company traffic off left.Tower informed us to call Company and return to gate. Company said they needed to re-deice us as it was not complete and that we taxied while deice truck was still spraying. We responded that we acknowledged deicing complete as well as saw a truck drive away. In discussing the incident; the FO and I thought they may have confused tail numbers as the frequency and ramp were very congested. Completed deicing and departed uneventfully. All checklists and FOM/AOM procedures were followed. It is now obvious that we took a similar call sign deicing complete call and assumed that our Crew was clear based on the truck we saw on the service road. Also; the FO cleared the right side for taxi just before the truck came around the corner of the wing. Suggestions for avoiding future miscommunication errors include requiring a visual wave off from Iceman as is required from Pushback Crew and a dedicated frequency per truck so as to avoid other call signs.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.