Narrative:

I am deeply concerned by the new procedures in place at atl that allow for immediate takeoff behind a B757. Tower controllers are pressuring crews to takeoff immediately behind B757s in all visual conditions; including the most hazardous - light quartering tailwinds. A few weeks back; I heard a controller admonish a crew that balked at the immediate clearance with a 'that's our new procedure' when they expressed concern about the wisdom of the departure. Recently; we were cleared to go behind a 767 (not 757) without a 'caution wake turbulence' warning; or with adequate separation. We refused the clearance. Would this have happened if the 757 was still properly classified? I don't think so - controllers are human; and a 767 looks like a 757 from a distance. On multiple occasions; we have had wake encounters with 757s on departure following this new procedure - minor deviations; but deviations nonetheless.I wonder what about atl makes it immune from the physics that govern wake turbulence behavior everywhere else on the planet earth. Cynically; I am thinking that someone in washington needed to show an increase in runway capacity; and putting crews and passengers in harm's way by ignoring wake turbulence was an easy way to do it.if we were limiting this idiocy to periods of moderate crosswind; I would be less concerned; but it is not. Furthermore; field conditions are often markedly different from those at a few hundred feet. It is not uncommon to takeoff in calm winds and immediately enter into a quartering tailwind.....and right into a lingering and powerful vortex.I urge the FAA to abandon this unsafe practice before it hurts someone.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: B717 First Officer expressed concern that the new in-trail procedures in place in ATL could lead to unsafe wake vortex encounters for departing aircraft.

Narrative: I am deeply concerned by the new procedures in place at ATL that allow for immediate takeoff behind a B757. Tower controllers are pressuring crews to takeoff immediately behind B757s in all visual conditions; including the most hazardous - light quartering tailwinds. A few weeks back; I heard a controller admonish a crew that balked at the immediate clearance with a 'that's our new procedure' when they expressed concern about the wisdom of the departure. Recently; we were cleared to go behind a 767 (not 757) without a 'caution wake turbulence' warning; or with adequate separation. We refused the clearance. Would this have happened if the 757 was still properly classified? I don't think so - controllers are human; and a 767 looks like a 757 from a distance. On multiple occasions; we have had wake encounters with 757s on departure following this new procedure - minor deviations; but deviations nonetheless.I wonder what about ATL makes it immune from the physics that govern wake turbulence behavior everywhere else on the planet earth. Cynically; I am thinking that someone in Washington needed to show an increase in runway capacity; and putting crews and passengers in harm's way by ignoring wake turbulence was an easy way to do it.If we were limiting this idiocy to periods of moderate crosswind; I would be less concerned; but it is not. Furthermore; field conditions are often markedly different from those at a few hundred feet. It is not uncommon to takeoff in calm winds and immediately enter into a quartering tailwind.....and right into a lingering and powerful vortex.I urge the FAA to abandon this unsafe practice before it hurts someone.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.