 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
A B737-800 antiskid failed during takeoff near rotation so enroute the QRH was completed and a landing calculation computed. The crew found the QRH stated they could land on any runway even wet; while the MEL increased landing distance so only 1 runway was available when wet.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1201106 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201409 |
| Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
| State Reference | US |
| Environment | |
| Light | Dawn |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | B737-800 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Takeoff |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Component | |
| Aircraft Component | Antiskid System |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
During take off roll near rotation got antiskid light. Enroute; we performed antiskid inop QRH checklist. The QRH showed no problem landing even wet. Reviewed MEL for any considerations. The MEL has a table that significantly reduces the allowable runway for landing calculations. MEL table showed that only xxr was acceptable and only dry; yet QRH showed no problems landing with antiskid inop. I am of course aware of no necessity to refer to the MEL in this case. I am afraid and concerned though that a runway is illegal to dispatch to; yet ok to land on when antiskid fails inflight.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A B737-800 antiskid failed during takeoff near rotation so enroute the QRH was completed and a landing calculation computed. The crew found the QRH stated they could land on any runway even wet; while the MEL increased landing distance so only 1 runway was available when wet.
Narrative: During take off roll near rotation got antiskid light. Enroute; we performed antiskid inop QRH Checklist. The QRH showed no problem landing even wet. Reviewed MEL for any considerations. The MEL has a table that significantly reduces the allowable runway for landing calculations. MEL table showed that only XXR was acceptable and only dry; yet QRH showed no problems landing with antiskid inop. I am of course aware of no necessity to refer to the MEL in this case. I am afraid and concerned though that a runway is illegal to dispatch to; yet OK to land on when antiskid fails inflight.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.