![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1178373 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201406 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | BBG.Tower |
| State Reference | MO |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | IMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | King Air C90 E90 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | Final Approach |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Component | |
| Aircraft Component | GPWS |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Multiengine |
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 50 Flight Crew Total 2250 Flight Crew Type 40 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe |
Narrative:
During two previous approaches; the co-captain and I had executed a missed approach due to a taws [terrain awareness warning system] warning on ILS 32 into bbg. We were completely stabilized and on profile with a normal descent rate. Approximately 400 feet above minimums; we received the taws warning and executed the missed approach per the afm and company policies and procedures. After 3 previous aircraft had successfully negotiated the ILS approach to land under 1 SM and 500 feet ovc conditions; we elected to inhibit the taws terrain feature. We landed safely and uneventfully at bbg on the third approach attempt. In hindsight; disabling the taws was not a prudent decision. While we were confident that the database may have been out of date due to the relatively recent construction of the airport (2009); we had no way of ensuring it was not other equipment that was faulty or programmed incorrectly.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: King Air flight crew experiences two consecutive TAWS alerts during two ILS 32 approaches into BBG resulting in go arounds. Other aircraft are successfully landing off the ILS 32 approach; so the TAWS is disabled and the third approach is successful.
Narrative: During two previous approaches; the Co-Captain and I had executed a missed approach due to a TAWS [Terrain Awareness Warning System] warning on ILS 32 into BBG. We were completely stabilized and on profile with a normal descent rate. Approximately 400 feet above minimums; we received the TAWS warning and executed the missed approach per the AFM and company policies and procedures. After 3 previous aircraft had successfully negotiated the ILS approach to land under 1 SM and 500 feet OVC conditions; we elected to inhibit the TAWS terrain feature. We landed safely and uneventfully at BBG on the third approach attempt. In hindsight; disabling the TAWS was not a prudent decision. While we were confident that the database may have been out of date due to the relatively recent construction of the airport (2009); we had no way of ensuring it was not other equipment that was faulty or programmed incorrectly.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.