![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1161138 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201403 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ZMA.ARTCC |
| State Reference | FL |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Cruise |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | First Officer Pilot Not Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Narrative:
Flying north with miami center southeast of crg. [There were] significant buildups and moderate turbulence throughout the area. [There were] many aircraft on frequency trying to check-in and trying to get clearances to avoid weather and turbulence. The controller was doing her best to handle the radio traffic; but; as she stated; she was working two frequencies simultaneously. Therefore; it was difficult to contact her as everyone was stepping on everyone else's transmission; she wasn't receiving our calls; and her calls were being blocked. This was a weekend afternoon; so I don't know if ATC is minimally-manned during this period; but the working controller was doing the best she could; but she was nevertheless overwhelmed by the circumstances. In my opinion; she needed to be working a single frequency and; frankly; that would have been very busy. This report is in no way suggesting the controller was faulty or making mistakes. As noted above; she was doing an admirable job in a very tough situation. The density of aircraft coupled with the bad weather situation really required additional controller availability. Fortunately; we didn't need to declare an emergency to avoid weather (due to an inability to communicate with ATC) and didn't come close to another aircraft. But; the potential for both was there. Storm buildups; turbulence; and aircraft density should require ATC to work a single frequency in order to allow for clear and frequent communication.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Pilot reports Controller working two frequencies and can't contact the Controller due to congestion on the frequencies.
Narrative: Flying north with Miami Center southeast of CRG. [There were] significant buildups and moderate turbulence throughout the area. [There were] many aircraft on frequency trying to check-in and trying to get clearances to avoid weather and turbulence. The Controller was doing her best to handle the radio traffic; but; as she stated; she was working two frequencies simultaneously. Therefore; it was difficult to contact her as everyone was stepping on everyone else's transmission; she wasn't receiving our calls; and her calls were being blocked. This was a weekend afternoon; so I don't know if ATC is minimally-manned during this period; but the working Controller was doing the best she could; but she was nevertheless overwhelmed by the circumstances. In my opinion; she needed to be working a single frequency and; frankly; that would have been very busy. This report is in no way suggesting the Controller was faulty or making mistakes. As noted above; she was doing an admirable job in a very tough situation. The density of aircraft coupled with the bad weather situation really required additional Controller availability. Fortunately; we didn't need to declare an emergency to avoid weather (due to an inability to communicate with ATC) and didn't come close to another aircraft. But; the potential for both was there. Storm buildups; turbulence; and aircraft density should require ATC to work a single frequency in order to allow for clear and frequent communication.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.