![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1159823 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201403 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | TTN.Airport |
| State Reference | NJ |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
| Route In Use | Visual Approach |
| Flight Plan | VFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Pilot Not Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Commercial |
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 150 Flight Crew Total 900 Flight Crew Type 500 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Conflict Airborne Conflict Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Track / Heading All Types |
| Miss Distance | Horizontal 1000 Vertical 1000 |
Narrative:
The tower requested our aircraft to extend the left downwind leg; and we would be #3 [for landing]. The new student I was instructing did not quite understand what this meant so I began to explain it to him in the aircraft. We were looking for the #2 traffic; to being following him towards the field. The student accidentally identified the #1 aircraft for the field as the #2; and we began a left base leg after reporting this to the tower; who cleared us for the turn. We inadvertently flew in front of the #2 traffic; who did have us in sight. The tower then asked us to 'verify the type of aircraft we were following'; at which point I noticed the type aircraft that we were supposed to follow on a long final. I took over the controls from the student; announced that we were flying 'base heading' and advanced the throttle to full to get as clear of the [other aircraft's] final approach course as possible. The tower asked for a right 270 degree turn to rejoin final and we landed without incident. I was asked to contact the tower upon switching to ground frequency; and the controller and I had a conversation about what happened.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: While operating in the traffic pattern with a flight instructor; a student pilot did not comprehend the landing pattern flow and turned in front of an aircraft on a straight in approach. Following prompting by the Tower Controller; the instructor recognized the conflict; took over the controls; and extended the base leg. The Tower provided a clearance for a circle back to final approach for landing.
Narrative: The Tower requested our aircraft to extend the left downwind leg; and we would be #3 [for landing]. The new student I was instructing did not quite understand what this meant so I began to explain it to him in the aircraft. We were looking for the #2 traffic; to being following him towards the field. The student accidentally identified the #1 aircraft for the field as the #2; and we began a left base leg after reporting this to the Tower; who cleared us for the turn. We inadvertently flew in front of the #2 traffic; who did have us in sight. The Tower then asked us to 'verify the type of aircraft we were following'; at which point I noticed the type aircraft that we were supposed to follow on a long final. I took over the controls from the student; announced that we were flying 'base heading' and advanced the throttle to full to get as clear of the [other aircraft's] final approach course as possible. The Tower asked for a right 270 degree turn to rejoin final and we landed without incident. I was asked to contact the Tower upon switching to Ground frequency; and the Controller and I had a conversation about what happened.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.