Narrative:

Upon initial approach; approximately 25 NM out; we were assigned to descend to and maintain 2;600 ft MSL. Expect vectors for the ILS approach. Both captain and first officer briefed the approach; dialed [the frequency] for the glideslope/localizer. Immediately; both the captain and first officer had the glideslope localizer flagged as non operational. We then tried to re-tune in the ILS and did not get the ident (not receiving signal). As soon as this happened we contacted approach to inquire if the ILS was functional. As per approach; the facility was functional. We then requested the RNAV/GPS approach. As soon as approach assigned us the approach; we then attempted to input the approach into our GPS/FMS computer. During this time; we unintentionally drifted below our assigned altitude of 3;000 ft MSL to 2;100 ft MSL. As soon as our altitude warning horn sounded off; an immediate climb to 2;600 ft MSL was initiated. Approach notified us of our altitude. Upon arrival; I contacted approach on the telephone to discuss the error. The incident occurred during the quick change for the approach from ILS to RNAV approach mode. Before the approach was selected in the aircraft navigational system and entered; the drift below altitude occurred. During this phase of flight the aircraft was on autopilot. However; altitude capture was unavailable for the type of navigational system installed in this particular aircraft. The director of operations for the company was immediately briefed on the situation and a follow up report was provided to the company the following day.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: B727 First Officer reports losing 500 FT while distracted by an inoperative ILS and the switch to an RNAV approach. A low altitude warning from ATC and EGPWS alert the crew and they return to the cleared altitude. The autopilot was not capable of maintaining an altitude during the switch to the RNAV approach.

Narrative: Upon initial approach; approximately 25 NM out; we were assigned to descend to and maintain 2;600 FT MSL. Expect vectors for the ILS approach. Both Captain and First Officer briefed the approach; dialed [the frequency] for the glideslope/localizer. Immediately; both the Captain and First Officer had the glideslope localizer flagged as non operational. We then tried to re-tune in the ILS and did not get the ident (not receiving signal). As soon as this happened we contacted Approach to inquire if the ILS was functional. As per Approach; the facility was functional. We then requested the RNAV/GPS approach. As soon as Approach assigned us the approach; we then attempted to input the approach into our GPS/FMS computer. During this time; we unintentionally drifted below our assigned altitude of 3;000 FT MSL to 2;100 FT MSL. As soon as our altitude warning horn sounded off; an immediate climb to 2;600 FT MSL was initiated. Approach notified us of our altitude. Upon arrival; I contacted Approach on the telephone to discuss the error. The incident occurred during the quick change for the approach from ILS to RNAV approach mode. Before the approach was selected in the aircraft navigational system and entered; the drift below altitude occurred. During this phase of flight the aircraft was on autopilot. However; altitude capture was unavailable for the type of navigational system installed in this particular aircraft. The Director of Operations for the company was immediately briefed on the situation and a follow up report was provided to the company the following day.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.