Narrative:

Enroute to mem we did the ltown 6 arrival verification and approach brief. The captain {flying pilot} said we are starting to get high; ask for lower. Before I could ask; approach gave us 'descend to 240'. The captain selected operation des and we started down. While in the descent we were given 'direct ltown; descend via the ltown 6 arrival north transition'. The captain entered 3;000 in the altitude alert window and we confirmed '3;000'. The aircraft was in the managed descent mode and speed and I remember seeing the magenta dot showing us below profile and descending at 1;000 FPM. This is normal until the aircraft gets back on profile or hits an altitude constraint. I got distracted {explained below} and approach called and asked what altitude we were descending through and I told them 7;600 feet. I immediately looked up and saw that we had not reached ltown and the altitude window was 10;000 feet to 16;000 feet. Approach advised us to maintain 7;000 feet. Somehow we ended up in the operation des or V/south mode and the aircraft was descending to 3;000 feet and ignoring the constraints.while on the arrival my efb generated a message 'software failure'. This had happened on the ground earlier and while trying to fix the problem I found a note saying to try turning the efb off and then back on. It worked and required all the data to be downloaded back into the efb. On the ltown arrival I was doing the same procedure to restore the efb when approach called to check our altitude. This had taken me out of the loop. I had the paper charts out for mem and should have left the efb alone so I could better monitor the arrival. We had the aircraft for 5 legs that day and it continued to fail numerous times and I left it alone. I also feel that situational awareness is lessened when we are taken off the full published arrival since it is briefed as a full procedure. There are also airbus software anomalies that occur when the arrival is changed yet I don't know if that was a problem in this case.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A319 Flight Crew reports descending below the LTOWN crossing restriction on the LTOWN 6 RNAV arrival to MEM. The crew had been cleared direct LTOWN but for unknown reasons the managed descent was lost after selection or was never selected.

Narrative: Enroute to MEM we did the LTOWN 6 Arrival verification and approach brief. The Captain {Flying Pilot} said we are starting to get high; ask for lower. Before I could ask; Approach gave us 'descend to 240'. The Captain selected OP DES and we started down. While in the descent we were given 'direct LTOWN; descend via the LTOWN 6 Arrival north transition'. The Captain entered 3;000 in the altitude alert window and we confirmed '3;000'. The aircraft was in the managed descent mode and speed and I remember seeing the magenta dot showing us below profile and descending at 1;000 FPM. This is normal until the aircraft gets back on profile or hits an altitude constraint. I got distracted {explained below} and Approach called and asked what altitude we were descending through and I told them 7;600 feet. I immediately looked up and saw that we had not reached LTOWN and the altitude window was 10;000 feet to 16;000 feet. Approach advised us to maintain 7;000 feet. Somehow we ended up in the OP DES or V/S mode and the aircraft was descending to 3;000 feet and ignoring the constraints.While on the arrival my EFB generated a message 'software failure'. This had happened on the ground earlier and while trying to fix the problem I found a note saying to try turning the EFB off and then back on. It worked and required all the data to be downloaded back into the EFB. On the LTOWN arrival I was doing the same procedure to restore the EFB when Approach called to check our altitude. This had taken me out of the loop. I had the paper charts out for MEM and should have left the EFB alone so I could better monitor the Arrival. We had the aircraft for 5 legs that day and it continued to fail numerous times and I left it alone. I also feel that situational awareness is lessened when we are taken off the full published arrival since it is briefed as a full procedure. There are also Airbus software anomalies that occur when the arrival is changed yet I don't know if that was a problem in this case.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.