![]()  | 
            37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System  | 
            
                
  | 
        
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1110346 | 
| Time | |
| Date | 201308 | 
| Local Time Of Day | 0001-0600 | 
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport | 
| State Reference | US | 
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC | 
| Light | Daylight | 
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | EMB ERJ 190/195 ER/LR | 
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 | 
| Flight Phase | Climb | 
| Flight Plan | IFR | 
| Component | |
| Aircraft Component | Fuel Quantity-Pressure Indication | 
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Captain Pilot Not Flying  | 
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) | 
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical Inflight Event / Encounter Fuel Issue  | 
Narrative:
Climbing through 3;500 ft the landing gear and flaps were retracted and the after takeoff checklist was complete. The first officer selected climb 1 thrust and announced doing so; I acknowledged. Shortly after as the autopilot accelerated the aircraft to 250 KTS; the icas message 'fuel 2 lo level' appeared. The first officer was assigned to continue flying the aircraft and to operate radio communications while I read aloud the QRH procedure. I sent several ACARS messages to dispatch informing him of the situation. The icas message (fuel 2 lo level) was no longer indicated; there were no indications of any abnormalities on any aircraft systems. We continued on route and advised dispatch that we considered the icas fuel warning to be erroneous; and of our intention to land at ZZZ; our nearest suitable airport at that time. Dispatch concurred. We requested expeditious routing and emergency equipment standing by. The flight attendants were briefed of the status and to plan a normal landing. We suspect the warning was erroneous; this aircraft has a history of erroneous indications /warnings; however; we chose to deal with the situation as if there was an actual low fuel issue to be extra cautious.given the numerous erroneous indications/warnings associated with this aircraft; I suggest that all the electronics be thoroughly inspected for faults.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: After evaluating the receipt of a FUEL 2 LO warning light aboard an EMB-190 with a history of erroneous warnings; the flight crew opted to divert to the nearest suitable airport despite the history.
Narrative: Climbing through 3;500 FT the landing gear and flaps were retracted and the After Takeoff Checklist was complete. The First Officer selected Climb 1 Thrust and announced doing so; I acknowledged. Shortly after as the autopilot accelerated the aircraft to 250 KTS; the ICAS message 'FUEL 2 LO LEVEL' appeared. The First Officer was assigned to continue flying the aircraft and to operate radio communications while I read aloud the QRH Procedure. I sent several ACARS messages to Dispatch informing him of the situation. The ICAS message (FUEL 2 LO LEVEL) was no longer indicated; there were no indications of any abnormalities on any aircraft systems. We continued on route and advised Dispatch that we considered the ICAS FUEL Warning to be erroneous; and of our intention to land at ZZZ; our nearest suitable airport at that time. Dispatch concurred. We requested expeditious routing and Emergency Equipment standing by. The flight attendants were briefed of the status and to plan a normal landing. We suspect the warning was erroneous; this aircraft has a history of erroneous indications /warnings; however; we chose to deal with the situation as if there was an actual low fuel issue to be extra cautious.Given the numerous erroneous indications/warnings associated with this aircraft; I suggest that all the electronics be thoroughly inspected for faults.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.