![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1092882 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201306 |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | EMB ERJ 170/175 ER/LR |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Cruise |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Procedural Maintenance Deviation - Procedural MEL |
Narrative:
We flew a round trip out and back with what I believe was a non-synchronous vibration. At 36;000 and M .76 it was occurring at approximately 2 minute intervals for 15-20 seconds. We tried different airspeeds unsuccessfully and ultimately found relief at a lower flight level. The first officer suggested engine anti-ice from another experience; which worked; especially on the return flight when ATC couldn't give us a new flight level fast enough.I believe the [continued operation with this] vibration is degrading our company's perceived commitment to safety and is creating a culture that encourages in-flight troubleshooting and flying with known discrepancies. I am embarrassed to fly this airplane. We received a comment from a non-revving pilot in the cabin after landing. I saw this airplane has some previous write-ups for vibration; but that we are creating a situation where individuals are discouraged from stepping forward.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: An ERJ Captain expressed concern that repeated dispatch of an aircraft with obvious periodic inflight vibrations; despite previous logbook writeups; presented a poor perception of his company's commitment to safety and encouraged flight crews to become complacent about deferred maintenance.
Narrative: We flew a round trip out and back with what I believe was a non-synchronous vibration. At 36;000 and M .76 it was occurring at approximately 2 minute intervals for 15-20 seconds. We tried different airspeeds unsuccessfully and ultimately found relief at a lower flight level. The First Officer suggested engine anti-ice from another experience; which worked; especially on the return flight when ATC couldn't give us a new flight level fast enough.I believe the [continued operation with this] vibration is degrading our company's perceived commitment to safety and is creating a culture that encourages in-flight troubleshooting and flying with known discrepancies. I am embarrassed to fly this airplane. We received a comment from a non-revving pilot in the cabin after landing. I saw this airplane has some previous write-ups for vibration; but that we are creating a situation where individuals are discouraged from stepping forward.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.