 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
During a gusty crosswind approach; the pilot of a bae-125-850 carried additional airspeed into the landing. This resulted in floating longer than expected prior to landing and the subsequent slow excursion from the runway into the overrun area. No damage or injuries occurred; and the crew was able to turn and taxi normally to the ramp.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1091326 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201305 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | JAC.Airport |
| State Reference | WY |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | BAe 125 Series 800 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
| Flight Phase | Landing |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Pilot Flying First Officer |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Person 2 | |
| Function | Pilot Not Flying Captain |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Ground Event / Encounter Other / Unknown Ground Excursion Runway Inflight Event / Encounter Unstabilized Approach |
Narrative:
During the landing rollout; we overran the runway at extremely low speed (under 20 knots) by approximately 10 feet. At no time did we ever leave the paved surface. There was zero damage to the aircraft or runway surfaces. We then initiated a 180 turn and taxied to the ramp uneventfully. The landing distance required was 2;957 feet and the landing distance available was 6;300 feet. At touchdown lift dump; thrust reversers; and brakes were all used.on short approach I kept a speed of reference+15 due to the gusty wind conditions. The additional speed caused the aircraft to float longer than anticipated. I should have reduced speed earlier; prior to touchdown in order to reduce the float. On landing rollout I should have used deeper thrust reverse at an earlier time. On landing rollout I should have used more aggressive braking at an earlier time. If all three or at least two of the above remedies were used; this event would of never occurred. In conclusion; I understand exactly what led up to this event. With this understanding I can assure you that an event of this nature will never happen again in my career. I will also not hesitate to use more aggressive thrust reverse normally in the future.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: During a gusty crosswind approach; the pilot of a BAE-125-850 carried additional airspeed into the landing. This resulted in floating longer than expected prior to landing and the subsequent slow excursion from the runway into the overrun area. No damage or injuries occurred; and the crew was able to turn and taxi normally to the ramp.
Narrative: During the landing rollout; we overran the runway at extremely low speed (under 20 knots) by approximately 10 feet. At no time did we ever leave the paved surface. There was zero damage to the aircraft or runway surfaces. We then initiated a 180 turn and taxied to the ramp uneventfully. The landing distance required was 2;957 feet and the Landing Distance Available was 6;300 feet. At touchdown lift dump; thrust reversers; and brakes were all used.On short approach I kept a speed of REF+15 due to the gusty wind conditions. The additional speed caused the aircraft to float longer than anticipated. I should have reduced speed earlier; prior to touchdown in order to reduce the float. On landing rollout I should have used deeper thrust reverse at an earlier time. On landing rollout I should have used more aggressive braking at an earlier time. If all three or at least two of the above remedies were used; this event would of never occurred. In conclusion; I understand exactly what led up to this event. With this understanding I can assure you that an event of this nature will never happen again in my career. I will also not hesitate to use more aggressive thrust reverse normally in the future.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.