 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Late and untimely changes to RNAV STAR assignments inbound to dia contributed to expedited descent rates and a TCAS RA response with conflicting traffic for a B757 flight crew. The reporter commented that; while the demands of lateral nav is acceptable; the multiple airspeed and altitude constraints common to many of the RNAV stars are distracting and require excessive flight crew attention.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1067327 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201302 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | DIA.Airport |
| State Reference | CO |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | B757 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Descent |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Component | |
| Aircraft Component | Autoflight System |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Captain Pilot Not Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 150 Flight Crew Total 22000 Flight Crew Type 4000 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict Airborne Conflict Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
During an RNAV arrival into dia we received an arrival change just prior to top of descent. This occurs quite often. We reprogrammed the new arrival and began descent. Just prior to the final fix on the RNAV arrival we were cleared for the transition to the runway. Because we hadn't anticipated this clearance we were then quite busy programming the change. This all happened while receiving late descent clearance for a visual to 16L. A high descent rate then caused a TCAS RA and a level off for the parallel aircraft on 16R. This further delayed our descent. The recovery went well. All of this would never have happened in the pre-RNAV approaches. I believe the new RNAV arrivals are very problematic with all the speed and altitude restrictions. The lateral navigation is not a problem. However; the designers need to limit the altitude and speed restrictions to the minimum necessary.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Late and untimely changes to RNAV STAR assignments inbound to DIA contributed to expedited descent rates and a TCAS RA response with conflicting traffic for a B757 flight crew. The reporter commented that; while the demands of lateral nav is acceptable; the multiple airspeed and altitude constraints common to many of the RNAV STARs are distracting and require excessive flight crew attention.
Narrative: During an RNAV arrival into DIA we received an arrival change just prior to top of descent. This occurs quite often. We reprogrammed the new arrival and began descent. Just prior to the final fix on the RNAV arrival we were cleared for the transition to the runway. Because we hadn't anticipated this clearance we were then quite busy programming the change. This all happened while receiving late descent clearance for a visual to 16L. A high descent rate then caused a TCAS RA and a level off for the parallel aircraft on 16R. This further delayed our descent. The recovery went well. All of this would never have happened in the pre-RNAV approaches. I believe the new RNAV arrivals are very problematic with all the speed and altitude restrictions. The lateral NAV is not a problem. However; the designers need to limit the altitude and speed restrictions to the minimum necessary.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.