|  | 37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System | 
| 
 | 
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1066922 | 
| Time | |
| Date | 201302 | 
| Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 | 
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport | 
| State Reference | US | 
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | IMC | 
| Light | Night | 
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Dash 8-100 | 
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 | 
| Flight Phase | Climb | 
| Flight Plan | IFR | 
| Component | |
| Aircraft Component | Electrical Distribution Busbar | 
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Pilot Flying Captain | 
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) | 
| Person 2 | |
| Function | Pilot Not Flying First Officer | 
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) | 
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical Deviation - Procedural Maintenance Inflight Event / Encounter Weather / Turbulence | 
Narrative:
After deicing; we departed. On climb out at approximately 3;800 feet; the right AC bus; right tru; and right elev horn heat caution lights illuminated. Since we had entered icing conditions; my first officer and I both agreed that we needed to return to the departure rather than continue. We got vectors for the ILS 27 and landed without incident; taxied to the gate and deplaned the passengers. For some reason; a fault occurred on the right AC bus. Among other things; this caused us to lose the ice protection systems fed by that bus. This in turn necessitated a return to the field because of the weather conditions.originally; we were supposed to take another aircraft for this flight. Approximately 25 minutes before departure we were advised that we were to pack up our things and swap into another aircraft. I called dispatch and then maintenance control to get more details. Maintenance control informed me that the aircraft we were going to had experienced 2 AC bus problems earlier in the day; but that it was corrected and signed off. Even so; I still voiced strong concerns about taking an airplane with a history of AC electrical problems into snow and icing conditions. (It was snowing at the time.) I suggested that the following day would be a much better time to get the plane to that destination; since the snowstorm would be gone by then. I was told that the decision was final; however; and to swap into it. I think in situations like this; when an airplane has a well-documented history of a recurring problem; it would be much wiser (and safer) to wait for better weather to get it to a maintenance base.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A DHC-8-100 departed in heavy snow and the Right AC Bus failed; so an emergency was declared the flight returned to the departure airport.
Narrative: After deicing; we departed. On climb out at approximately 3;800 feet; the R AC BUS; R TRU; AND R ELEV HORN HEAT caution lights illuminated. Since we had entered icing conditions; my First Officer and I both agreed that we needed to return to the departure rather than continue. We got vectors for the ILS 27 and landed without incident; taxied to the gate and deplaned the passengers. For some reason; a fault occurred on the R AC BUS. Among other things; this caused us to lose the ice protection systems fed by that bus. This in turn necessitated a return to the field because of the weather conditions.Originally; we were supposed to take another aircraft for this flight. Approximately 25 minutes before departure we were advised that we were to pack up our things and swap into another aircraft. I called Dispatch and then Maintenance Control to get more details. Maintenance Control informed me that the aircraft we were going to had experienced 2 AC BUS problems earlier in the day; but that it was corrected and signed off. Even so; I still voiced strong concerns about taking an airplane with a history of AC electrical problems into snow and icing conditions. (It was snowing at the time.) I suggested that the following day would be a much better time to get the plane to that destination; since the snowstorm would be gone by then. I was told that the decision was final; however; and to swap into it. I think in situations like this; when an airplane has a well-documented history of a recurring problem; it would be much wiser (and safer) to wait for better weather to get it to a maintenance base.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.