Narrative:

An H60 helicopter was IFR doing an ILS approach to runway 35 with a missed approach of 090 and 30. He departed VFR and was turned westbound by mht. The tower called and informed me he was VFR and not requesting advisories. When I advised the tower; you do know that a class C requirement is that I provide radar service to all departures until exiting the class C? The tower advised yes; but he doesn't want advisories. Mht tower needs to learn what a class C is; and what the requirements of a class C are. Too many controllers in the tower are just allowing VFR aircraft to depart without class C services. The class C was put in place because of the volume of passengers leaving the mht airport. Failure to comply could possibly cause a mid air collision.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A90 Controller voiced concern regarding the lack Class C requirements demonstrated by some controllers at MHT.

Narrative: An H60 helicopter was IFR doing an ILS approach to Runway 35 with a missed approach of 090 and 30. He departed VFR and was turned westbound by MHT. The Tower called and informed me he was VFR and not requesting advisories. When I advised the Tower; you do know that a Class C requirement is that I provide RADAR service to all departures until exiting the Class C? The Tower advised yes; but he doesn't want advisories. MHT Tower needs to learn what a Class C is; and what the requirements of a Class C are. Too many controllers in the Tower are just allowing VFR aircraft to depart without Class C services. The Class C was put in place because of the volume of passengers leaving the MHT airport. Failure to comply could possibly cause a mid air collision.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.